Marketing Lessons From Going From the World’s Okayest Marketer to Head of Marketing
How my career in marketing went from okay at best to leading marketing by testing ideas, breaking rules, learning from failures, and focusing on what actually works.
Marketing Isn’t Magic, It’s Reps
Marketing is funny because everyone thinks they understand it right up until they are responsible for results. Seven years ago, my version of marketing competence landed somewhere between passable and replaceable. I was not terrible. I was not impressive. I was the world’s okayest marketer, and that is not self deprecation. That is accuracy.
Most people stuck in marketing are not stuck because they lack talent. They are stuck because they treat marketing like a personality trait instead of a practice. They read threads. They save swipe files. They repeat advice that worked for someone else in a different market, with a different budget, at a different time. Then they wonder why nothing moves.
I did not wake up one day as head of marketing because I cracked some secret system. I got there by testing ideas, breaking rules I was told not to question, and learning where marketing actually breaks inside real companies. Some tests worked better than expected. Some fell flat on their face. All of them sharpened my judgment.
This is not a victory lap. It is a report from the field. If you have ever felt like marketing “just doesn’t work,” odds are high you have only been exposed to the safe version. The one that protects egos and budgets but never produces real signal.
Marketing Improves Faster When You Stop Pretending You Know Everything
Marketing gets harder the moment you are no longer the smartest person in the room. That sounds backward, but it is true. Early in your career, you can survive on confidence and effort. Later on, marketing exposes every assumption you refuse to question.
A lot of my progress in marketing over the last four years came from working under leadership that did not confuse activity with competence. They did not reward me for shipping things fast. They rewarded me for explaining why something should work, what signal we were looking for, and what we would change if it failed. That mindset alone separates people who grow in marketing from people who recycle the same playbook for a decade.
Mentorship in marketing is not about being told what button to press. It is about being given room to think, test, and sometimes be wrong without getting defensive. Bad marketing cultures punish failure. Good ones punish refusing to learn from it.
I was allowed to propose ideas that were not in the playbook. I was also expected to defend them. That forced me to understand marketing beyond channels and tactics. I had to understand incentives, timing, audience psychology, and internal constraints. When a test failed, nobody asked me to justify the loss. They asked me what we learned and how that changed the next move.
This is where most marketing advice breaks down. It assumes you are operating in a vacuum. Real marketing happens inside businesses with sales teams, budgets, founders, and pressure. When leadership gives you air cover to experiment, your marketing judgment compounds fast. When they do not, you end up optimizing things that do not matter and calling it experience.
Action Item
If you want to get better at marketing quickly, start doing this next week. Write down the last three marketing ideas you ran without being able to clearly explain why they should work. Then rewrite each one as a simple hypothesis. If you cannot explain the expected outcome and what failure would teach you, do not run the test. That habit alone will put you ahead of most people calling themselves marketers.
Marketing Works Better When You Stop Talking About Your Product
Marketing teams love talking about their product because it feels productive and safe. It is also why so much marketing underperforms. Prospects do not wake up hoping to learn about your features. They wake up trying to solve problems that are costing them time, money, or credibility.
At one company, we were struggling with lead gen and converting the leads we already had. The default suggestion was predictable. Spend more. Run more webinars. Push the product harder. That is what bad marketing looks like when it wears a serious face.
Instead, I suggested something that made people uncomfortable. Stop running webinars about our product entirely. Run sessions that help the audience solve problems they were already failing at. Lead gen. Cold email. Positioning. The things agency owners actually argued about internally but rarely admitted publicly.
Here is the important marketing lesson. We were not hiding the product. We were earning the right to talk about it. When you help someone make progress on a problem, they assume you can help them solve the next one. That trust does more work than any feature slide ever will.
Those webinars did not feel like marketing. That is why they worked. Attendance went up. Engagement improved. Sales got better conversations instead of half interested leads. And yes, we still generated pipeline. We just stopped pretending the product was the starting point.
This is the part people miss. Good marketing often looks indirect. It looks inefficient to people obsessed with attribution dashboards. But when your marketing respects the audience’s reality, conversion problems downstream get easier instead of harder.
Action Item
Audit your last five pieces of marketing content. Count how many times you talked about your product versus how often you talked about the prospect’s actual problems. If the product wins, rewrite one asset this month that delivers value without asking for anything in return. Then watch what happens to engagement and sales conversations.
Marketing Tests That Fail Still Pay Off
Here is a truth most people in marketing will not say out loud. If every test you run works, you are not testing anything interesting. You are repeating what already feels safe and calling it strategy.
One night in Boston, after a few drinks and a long day, my boss asked a simple question. What do you want to test that you have never been allowed to try? My answer was not smart or trendy. I wanted to try direct mail. Postcards, specifically. Old school, physical, impossible to ignore.
So I ran with it. I designed the ugliest postcards you can imagine. On purpose. I built a landing page that looked like it escaped from a 1998 Geocities site. Also on purpose. Then we sent a postcard to every demo that did not convert for ninety days straight.
The result. Zero conversions. Not low conversions. None.
Here is where marketing judgment actually forms. That test was not a waste. It taught me more than a small win would have. I learned how hard it is to change buyer behavior after a demo. I learned that novelty alone does not overcome bad timing. I learned that physical marketing does not magically fix weak intent.
Most marketing teams would quietly bury that test and pretend it never happened. That is a mistake. Failed marketing experiments give you boundaries. They tell you where not to spend time and money again. That clarity compounds.
This is why people stall in marketing careers. They avoid tests that might fail publicly. They protect their reputation instead of improving their thinking. The people who advance are willing to run clean experiments, admit when something did not work, and move on smarter.
Action Item
Write down one marketing idea you have avoided because it might not work. Design a small test that limits downside and gives you a clear answer. Run it within thirty days. If it fails, document exactly why. That postmortem will be more valuable than another safe win.
Marketing Gets Cheaper When You Respect the Prospect
Here is a mistake I see constantly in marketing. When performance slips, teams look for a new channel instead of fixing behavior. Cost per lead goes up and the reaction is panic. New platform. New agency. New targeting. Almost nobody asks if the experience itself has become worse.
We hit that exact moment. The company was doing fine, but marketing efficiency was trending the wrong direction. Cost per lead kept climbing. No show rates were creeping toward thirty percent. Sales was frustrated. Marketing was defensive. That is the danger zone where bad decisions usually get made.
Instead of scaling spend, I suggested we change how we showed up. Different tone. Different copy. Less posturing. More human. On top of that, I pushed for something that felt uncomfortable to some people. Give before asking. We automated a five dollar Starbucks gift card to every demo that booked.
Most marketing teams are afraid to give anything away because they do not trust their own value. They hide behind forms and friction, then complain about lead quality. Respecting the prospect means acknowledging their time has value.
The results were not subtle. Cost per lead dropped by fifty percent. No show rates fell under twenty percent. Sales conversations improved because people showed up already feeling treated well. That is not a trick. That is basic human behavior applied to marketing.
This is the lesson. Marketing economics improve when you stop treating prospects like line items and start treating them like people making tradeoffs. Small gestures can outperform big optimizations when they align with how buyers actually behave.
Action Item
Pick one step in your marketing funnel where prospects give time or attention before receiving value. Add something small and immediate that shows respect for that exchange. Track cost per lead and show up rates for thirty days. If nothing improves, remove it. If it does, you just found a lever most teams ignore.
Marketing careers rarely change because of one big break. They change because of accumulated judgment. Testing ideas. Owning failures. Paying attention to what actually moves behavior instead of what looks good in a report. Going from the world’s okayest marketer to head of marketing was not a glow up. It was reps. It was pressure. It was choosing to think instead of copying.
If there is a takeaway here, it is this. When marketing feels stuck, it is usually not broken. It is under examined. The people who move ahead are not louder or luckier. They are more honest about what works, what does not, and why. If you want more thinking like this, fewer recycled tactics, and real signal from someone who has tested it the hard way, Upgrade Your Subscription.


